Employment Ordinance

(1)
This section applies in relation to an employee who is subject to a
Cap. 599
requirement, and is dismissed or has the terms
                of the employee’s contract of employment varied by the employer.
(2)
In determining for the purposes of this Part whether the employer has a valid
                reason for the dismissal of the employee or the variation of the terms of the
                employee’s contract of employment within the meaning of
section 32K
, the
                employee’s absence from work due to the employee’s compliance with the
Cap. 599
requirement does not constitute a valid reason
                for the dismissal or variation.