Insurance Ordinance

(1)
If an investigator requires a person to give an answer to a question or to give an explanation or further particulars under this Division, the investigator must ensure that the person has first been informed of the effect of subsection (2).
(2)
Despite anything in this Ordinance and subject to subsection (3
)—
(a)
if an investigator requires a person to give an answer to a question or to give an explanation or further particulars under this Division; and
(b)
the answer, or the explanation or further particulars, might tend to incriminate the person and the person so claims before giving the answer or giving the explanation or further particulars,
the requirement and the question and answer, or the explanation or further particulars, are not admissible in evidence against the person in criminal proceedings in a court of law.
(3)
Subsection (2) does not apply to criminal proceedings in which the person is, in relation to the answer, or the explanation or further particulars, charged
with—
(a)
an offence under
section 64ZZL(1)
, (2), (3), (4) or (5), or under Part V of the Crimes Ordinance (
Cap. 200
); or
(b)
perjury.