|
CACC 7/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2012
(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO. 1151 OF 2011)
____________
BETWEEN
| |
HKSAR |
Respondent |
|
and
|
| |
LI KIN KEUNG（李健強） |
Applicant |
____________
Before: Hon Lunn JA, Fung and McWalters JJ in Court
Date of Hearing: 12 June 2012
Date of Judgment: 12 June 2012
Date of Reasons for Judgment: 28 June 2012
-------------------------------
C O R R I G E N D U M
-------------------------------
The paragraph 33 on page 11,
“We also are of the view that the information furnished under s 29(2)(a) cannot justify an enhancement of the 15 months starting point. The information furnished under section 29(2)(a) all went to potential harm, not actual harm.”
should read
“We also are of the view that the information furnished under s 27(2)(a) cannot justify an enhancement of the 15 months starting point. The information furnished under section 27(2)(a) all went to potential harm, not actual harm.”
Dated this 10th day of July 2012.
|
(Danny Tse)
Clerk to Hon McWalters J |
|