HKSAR v. LI KIN KEUNG

CACC 7/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2012

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO. 1151 OF 2011)

____________

____________

-------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

-------------------------------

The paragraph 15 on page 6,

“As to the prevalence of the offence, the judge accepted that on the statistical evidence presented to her the offence committed by the applicant did not seem to be increasingly rapidly.”

should read

“As to the prevalence of the offence, the judge accepted that on the statistical evidence presented to her the offence committed by the applicant did not seem to be increasing rapidly.”

Dated this 21^th day of August 2012.