HKSAR v. OKAFOR PETER ERIC NWABUNWANNE

CAC C 437/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 437 OF 2010

(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 74 OF 2010)

________________________

BETWEEN

________________________

____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

____________________

Please be informed that the first sentence of paragraph 36 on page 21 should read as follows:

For the reasons given by Macrae J in Okafor’s case, it is perfectly apparent from the record that no question of voluntariness arose and that, even if somehow it or the issue of discretion raised its head above the parapet, Okafor was patently anxious to unburden himself.

Dated the 3^rd day of February, 2012.