KARL RIEKER GMBH and CO. KG v. BONUS GARMENT CO. (a firm)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

1995, No. 153
(Civil)

___________

________________

Corrigenda

________________

In the ex tempore judgment delivered by the Hon. Liu J.A. in the above action, Kindly note the following corrections:

(1) P.10, line 14, delete the words “in which” and substitute therefor the word “hence”;

(2) P.11, line 7, after the word “averred”. Insert the words “by the 1st defendant”;

(3) P.11, line 8, before the word “sued”, insert the words ‘should have:’ and

(4) P.11, line 9, delete the word “so” and substitute therefor the words “it could”.

Similarly, in the same case as reported in [1995] 3 HKC 721 at p.731

(1) Line4, A/B, delete the words “in which” and substitute therefore the word “hence”;

(2) Line 32, G, delete the word “so”;

(3) Line 32, G, after the word “averred”, inserted the words “by the parties that the contract had been rescinded”;

(4) Line 34, G/H delete the word “so” and substitute therefore the words “it could”.

Dated the 15th Day of February, 1996