Mr Patrick SL Wong
HCMP 21A/2015
HCMP 21/2015
香港特別行政區
高等法院原訟法庭
民事司法管轄權
高院雜項案件2015年第21號
________________________
_______________
DECISION ______________
1. The 2nd defendant appears this morning after judgment has been given by the court. There is no good explanation for his lateness.
2. Nevertheless, the 2nd defendant was invited to address the court on what he might have to say about these matters. Essentially, the 2nd defendant repeated what was stated in his affirmation. He accepted that he will have to move out of the Property but asked for time to do so.
3. Having considered the 2nd defendant’s submissions, I see no reason to revisit the judgment.
Mr Patrick SL Wong, instructed by Chiu, Szeto & Cheng, for the plaintiff
The 1st defendant appeared in person
The 2nd defendant appeared in person
The 3rd defendant appeared in person
The 4th defendant appeared in person