Case Details
Applicant(s):
THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER
Respondent(s):
CHAN HING TO
For Respondent(s):
On the morning of the appeal, Mr. Douglas Lam, counsel
- Yuen JA, referred us to the judgment of this Court (Ma CJHC, Tang VP, Stock JA) in <i>Chan Kin Shing Sonny v. Insider Dealing Tribunal and Financial Secretary</i> (CACV 358 and 360 of 2005) which decided that a single judge of the Court of Appeal does not have jurisdiction to strike out a notice of appeal as this involves a ‘determination of the appeal’ as stipulated in section 35 of the <i>High Court Ordinance</i> (Cap. 4). It is unfortunate that this case which was decided on 28 November 2006 was not drawn by the parties to Yuen JA’s attention when she heard the application in January 2007.” </td>
THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. CHAN HING TO
CACV 84AM/2006
Court of Appeal
Judges:Yuen JA, referred us to the judgment of this Court (Ma CJHC, Tang VP, Stock JA) in <i>Chan Kin Shing Sonny v. Insider Dealing Tribunal and Financial Secretary</i> (CACV 358 and 360 of 2005) which decided that a single judge of the Court of Appeal does not have jurisdiction to strike out a notice of appeal as this involves a ‘determination of the appeal’ as stipulated in section 35 of the <i>High Court Ordinance</i> (Cap. 4). It is unfortunate that this case which was decided on 28 November 2006 was not drawn by the parties to Yuen JA’s attention when she heard the application in January 2007.” </td>
Citation
Court
Procedural posture
Issues
Holdings
Legal principles
Disposition
Key citations
Appeal history
THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. CHAN HING TO
CFI · 25 Jan 2006
On appeal fromTHE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. CHAN HING TO
CA · 19 Jan 2007
On appeal fromTHE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. CHAN HING TO
CA · 25 Apr 2007
On appeal fromTHE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. CHAN HING TO
CA · 22 Jul 2008
On appeal fromTHE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. CHAN HING TO
CA
This judgment