|
HCCW 10/2014
[2018] HKCFI 1986
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES WINDING‑UP PROCEEDINGS NO 10 OF 2014
________________
| |
IN THE MATTER of the Companies Ordinance
|
| |
and
|
| |
IN THE MATTER of Hong Kong Mercantile Exchange Limited (香港商品交易所有限公司)
|
________________
| Before: Hon Harris J in Chambers |
| Date of Hearing: 24 August 2018 |
| Date of Decision: 24 August 2018 |
___________________
D E C I S I O N
___________________
1. I have before me a summons dated 14 June 2017 seeking a permanent stay of the winding-up proceedings involving Hong Kong Mercantile Exchange Limited and a simultaneous discharge of the liquidators. The background to the application is straightforward. The Company’s liabilities to unsecured creditors have been compromised pursuant to a scheme of arrangement.
2. The circumstances in which the court will grant a stay of extant winding-up proceedings are summarised in para 2 of my judgment in Re The Grande Holdings Limited, unreported, HCCW 177/2011, 9 May 2016. They are—
(1) the court has regard to the interests of members, creditors and the liquidator;
(2) the court also considers whether the stay is conducive to commercial morality and the interests of the public at large;
(3) in the circumstances of the case, whether if a stay is granted all creditors and potential outstanding liabilities of the company are provided for.
3. It is normally the case where unsecured debts have been compromised pursuant to a scheme of arrangement that these conditions are readily satisfied.
4. An issue did arise in the present matter as a result of a delay in completion of the scheme but that issue has now been resolved and as a consequence, I am satisfied that the normal criteria have been met and it is an appropriate case to stay the winding-up proceedings and make the consequential order discharging the liquidators.
5. The costs of the application will be paid out of the assets of the Company.
| |
(Jonathan Harris) |
| |
Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court |
Mr Michael Lok, instructed by Wilkinson & Grist, for the liquidators
The attendance of the Official Receiver was excused
|