YUNG MEI CHUN v. CHAN SING CHUEN

HCMP 1178/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1178 OF 2009

(ON AN INTENDED APPEAL FROM DCCJ NO. 4126 OF 2007)

----------------------

----------------------

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

Hon Tang VP (giving the judgment of the Court):

RAO

1.  In our judgment of 5  October 2009, we said, for the reasons we gave there, we were provisionally minded to make against the applicant a restricted application order (RAO) (para. 6).  We directed the applicant to lodge written submission with the Court within 14 days if she should wish to be heard on the matter and indicated that the matter would then be decided by the Court accordingly (para. 7).

2.  On 19 October 2009, the applicant provided the Court with lengthy submissions.  The main submission is 21 pages long.  There is an Exhibit 1 which runs to 88 pages.  It is unnecessary to deal with such submissions in any detail.  In these documents, the applicant mounted an intemperate attack on our judgments of 4 September 2009 and 5 October 2009, as well as the judgment of District Judge Lok given on 11  June 2009.  The contents of the applicant’s submission have reinforced our view that a RAO should be made.

3.  We now make an order prohibiting the plaintiff from making any further application to this Court in HCMP 1178/2009, save with leave of Tang VP (or another judge designated by the Chief Judge, High Court).