Case Details

Citation

NG KWOK CHING v. TO PUI KUI, the administratrix of the estate of NG PO SUM, Deceased AND OTHERS, FAMV 10M/2015

Case Number

FAMV 10M/2015

Court

Court of Final Appeal

(CFA)

Decision Date

23 March 2016

Parties

Applicant(s):

NG KWOK CHING

Respondent(s):

NG KWOK PIU, NG YIU CHI, NG KAY CHEE, NG WOON CHI also known as OLYMPIA WOON CHI NG also known as OLYMPIA JUE, NG KWOK TUNG, NG OI CHE, NG KWOK TAI, CONFEDERATED ASSETS GROUP LIMITED

Judges

Ribeiro
Tang
Fok

NG KWOK CHING v. TO PUI KUI, the administratrix of the estate of NG PO SUM, Deceased AND OTHERS

FAMV 10M/2015

Court of Final Appeal23 March 2016

Judges:RibeiroTangFok

FAMV10M/2015 NG KWOK CHING v. TO PUI KUI, the administratrix of the estate of NG PO SUM, Deceased AND OTHERS

FAMV Nos. 10, 50 & 51 of 2015
(Heard together)
FAMV No. 10 of 2015

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 10 OF 2015 (CIVIL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM CACV NO. 281 OF 2012)

____________________

BETWEEN

	TO PUI KUI, the Administratrix of the estate of NG PO SUM, Deceased	Plaintiff (1^st Respondent)
	and
	NG KWOK PIU	1^st Defendant (2^nd Respondent)
	NG YIU CHI	2^nd Defendant (3^rd Respondent)
	NG KAY CHEE	3^rd Defendant (4^th Respondent)
	NG WOON CHI also known as OLYMPIA WOON CHI NG also known as OLYMPIA JUE	4^th Defendant (5^th Respondent)
	NG KWOK TUNG	5^th Defendant (6^th Respondent)
	NG KWOK CHING	6^thDefendant (Applicant)
	NG OI CHE	7^thDefendant (7^th Respondent)
	NG KWOK TAI	8^th Defendant (8^th Respondent)
	CONFEDERATED ASSETS GROUP LIMITED	9^th Defendant (9^th Respondent)

_______________________

AND

FAMV No. 50 of 2015

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 50 OF 2015 (CIVIL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM CACV NO. 281 OF 2012)

_______________________

BETWEEN

	TO PUI KUI, the Administratrix of the estate of NG PO SUM, Deceased	Plaintiff (Applicant)
	and
	NG KWOK PIU	1^st Defendant (1^st Respondent)
	NG YIU CHI	2^nd Defendant (2^nd Respondent)
	NG KAY CHEE	3^rd Defendant (3^rd Respondent)
	NG WOON CHI also known as OLYMPIA WOON CHI NG also known as OLYMPIA JUE	4^th Defendant (4^th Respondent)
	NG KWOK TUNG	5^th Defendant (5^th Respondent)
	NG KWOK CHING	6^thDefendant (6^th Respondent)
	NG OI CHE	7^thDefendant (7^th Respondent)
	NG KWOK TAI	8^th Defendant (8^th Respondent)
	CONFEDERATED ASSETS GROUP LIMITED	9^th Defendant (9^th Respondent)

_______________________

AND

FAMV No. 51 of 2015

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 51 OF 2015 (CIVIL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM CACV NO. 1 OF 2013)

_______________________

BETWEEN

	TO PUI KUI, the Administratrix of the estate of NG PO SUM, Deceased	Plaintiff (Applicant)
	and
	NG KWOK PIU	1^st Defendant (1^st Respondent)
	NG YIU CHI	2^nd Defendant (2^nd Respondent)
	NG KAY CHEE	3^rd Defendant (3^rd Respondent)
	NG WOON CHI also known as OLYMPIA WOON CHI NG also known as OLYMPIA JUE	4^th Defendant (4^th Respondent)
	NG KWOK TUNG	5^th Defendant (5^th Respondent)
	NG KWOK CHING	6^thDefendant (6^th Respondent)
	NG OI CHE	7^thDefendant (7^th Respondent)
	NG KWOK TAI	8^th Defendant (8^th Respondent)
	CONFEDERATED ASSETS GROUP LIMITED	9^th Defendant (9^th Respondent)

____________________

Appeal Committee : Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Tang PJ and Mr Justice Fok PJ

Date of Hearing and Determination : 23 March 2016

Date of Reasons for Determination : 1 April 2016

Date of Corrigendum : 12 April 2016

_________________________________

CORRIGENDUM

_________________________________

Please note the following amendments in the Reasons for Determination dated 1 April 2016:

On page 7 at paragraph 10:

the 1^st sentence-“the Official Receiver (“the OR”) as his Trustee” should read “the Official Receiver (“the OR”) and his Trustees”;

the 2^nd sentence - “Jeremy and the OR” should read “Jeremy and his Trustees”;

the 3^rd sentence - “The OR has now…” should read “The Trustees have now …”;

the last sentence - “the OR” should read “the Trustees”.

On page 7 at paragraph 11:

the 1^st sentence- “the OR or” should be inserted before “his trustee in bankruptcy”;

the 2^nd sentence - “… the OR does not so consent” should read “… the Trustees do not so consent”.

(Phemie Chan)

for Registrar, CFA

Court

Procedural posture

Issues

Holdings

Legal principles

Disposition

Appeal history

TO PUI KUI v. NG KWOK PIU AND OTHERS
CFI · 31 Oct 2012
On appeal from
TO PUI KUI v. NG KWOK PIU AND OTHERS
CA · 15 Jul 2014
On appeal from
TO PUI KUI v. NG KWOK PIU AND OTHERS
CA · 21 Aug 2014
On appeal from
TO PUI KUI v. NG KWOK PIU AND OTHERS
CA · 21 Aug 2014
On appeal from
TO PUI KUI v. NG KWOK PIU AND OTHERS
CA · 29 Jan 2015
On appeal from
TO PUI KUI, THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF NG PO SUM, DECEASED v. NG KWOK PIU AND OTHERS
CA · 24 Sept 2015
On appeal from
TO PUI KUI, THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF NG PO SUM, DECEASED v. NG KWOK PIU AND OTHERS
CA · 2 Mar 2016
On appeal from
NG KWOK CHING v. TO PUI KUI, the administratrix of the estate of NG PO SUM, Deceased AND OTHERS
CFA · 23 Mar 2016
This judgment
TO PUI KUI, the administratrix of the estate of NG PO SUM, Deceased v. NG KWOK PIU AND OTHERS
CFA · 23 Mar 2016
On appeal from
TO PUI KUI, THE ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF NG PO SUM, DECEASED v. NG KWOK PIU AND OTHERS
CA · 28 Sept 2023 · [2023] HKCA 1108
On appeal from