Case Details

Citation

LI YUEN YAU v. VIATECH ENGINEERING LTD AND ANOTHER, DCEC 153M/2004

Case Number

DCEC 153M/2004

Court

District Court

(DC)

Decision Date

19 January 2007

Parties

Applicant(s):

LI YUEN YAU acting for herself and other members of the family, namely, TSO HON YING and TSO CHING YI, of TSO PAK KUEN, deceased

Respondent(s):

other members of the family, namely, TSO HON YING and TSO CHING YI, of TSO PAK KUEN, deceased Applicant and VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED, VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED, ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED

Judges

Deputy District Anthony Kwok

LI YUEN YAU v. VIATECH ENGINEERING LTD AND ANOTHER

DCEC 153M/2004

District Court19 January 2007

Judges:Deputy District Anthony Kwok

DCEC000153M/2004 LI YUEN YAU v. VIATECH ENGINEERING LTD AND ANOTHER

DCEC 153-4 & 241-6/2004

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 153 OF 2004

_______________

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN

	LI YUEN YAU acting for herself and other members of the family, namely, TSO HON YING and TSO CHING YI, of TSO PAK KUEN, deceased	Applicant
	and
	VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED	1^st Respondent
	ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED	2^nd Respondent

________________

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 154 OF 2004

_______________

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN

	LEE CHIU LAN acting for herself and other members of the family, namely, CHAN LORRAINE, CHAN KING FAI CHAN WAI YING, of CHAN SHING TONG, deceased	Applicant
	and
	VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED	1^st Respondent
	ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED	2^nd Respondent

________________

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 241 OF 2004

_______________

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN

	TING KAM YUEN, the lawful attorney of IGNATOVA LYUDMILA MIKHALOVNA acting herself and other members of the family of IGNATOV ALEKSANDR GRIGOREVICH, deceased	Applicant
	and
	VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED	1^st Respondent
	ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED	2^nd Respondent

________________

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 242 OF 2004

_______________

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN

	TING KAM YUEN, the lawful attorney of MIKHAYLISHINA OLESYA IGOREVNA acting herself and other members of the family of MIKHAYLISHIN ANATOLIY BOGDANOVICH, deceased	Applicant
	and
	VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED	1^st Respondent
	ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED	2^nd Respondent

________________

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 243 OF 2004

_______________

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN

	TING KAM YUEN, the lawful attorney of SHERSTYUK IRINA SERGEEVNA acting herself and other members of the family of SHERSTYUK PAVEL YURIVICH, deceased	Applicant
	and
	VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED	1^st Respondent
	ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED	2^nd Respondent

________________

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 244 OF 2004

_______________

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN

	TING KAM YUEN, the lawful attorney of STEPANOVA VALENTINA KONSTANTINOVNA acting herself and other members of the family of KUZNETSOV YURIY ANATOLEVICH, deceased	Applicant
	and
	VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED	1^st Respondent
	ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED	2^nd Respondent

________________

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 245 OF 2004

_______________

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN

	TING KAM YUEN, the lawful attorney of POZDNYAK OLGA LVOVNA acting herself and other members of the family of POZDNYAK NIKOLAY IVANOVICH, deceased	Applicant
	and
	VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED	1^st Respondent
	ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED	2^nd Respondent

________________

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION CASE NO. 246 OF 2004

_______________

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BETWEEN

	TING KAM YUEN, the lawful attorney of TROFIMOVA OKSANA VLADIMIROVNA acting herself and other members of the family of TROFIMOV GERMAN EVGENEVICH, deceased	Applicant
	and
	VIATECH ENGINEERING LIMITED	1^st Respondent
	ZEN PACIFIC CIVIL CONTRACTORS LIMITED	2^nd Respondent

________________

Coram: Deputy District Judge Anthony Kwok in Court

Date of Hearing: 19 January 2007

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 20 March 2007

CORRIGENDUM

Paragraph 22(a) on page 16 of the Judgment should read:

“TSO Pak- kuen (DCEC 153/2004) – Fitter (aged 59)

HK$14,000 x 36 months = HK$504,000.”

Paragraph 22(e) on page 17 of the Judgment should read:

“SHERSTYUK (DCEC 243/2004) – 3^rd Officer (aged 25)

US$1,054.29 x 84 months = US$88,560.36”

Paragraph 22(h) on page 17 of the Judgment should read:

“TROFIMOV (DCEC 246/2004) – Cook (aged 36)

US$1,087.38 x 84 months = US$91,339.92”

LI YUEN YAU v. VIATECH ENGINEERING LTD AND ANOTHER

Court

Procedural posture

Issues

Holdings

Legal principles

Disposition

Key citations