Case Details

Citation

厦門新景地集團有限公司 formerly known as 厦門市鑫新景地房地產有限公司 v. ETON PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER, HCCT 54M/2007

Case Number

HCCT 54M/2007

Court

Court of First Instance

(CFI)

Decision Date

24 June 2008

Parties

Applicant(s):

厦門新景地集團有限公司 formerly known as 厦門市鑫新景地房地產有限公司

Respondent(s):

Eton Properties Limited (裕景興業有限公司), Eton Properties (Holdings) Limited (裕景興業(集團)有限公司)

厦門新景地集團有限公司 formerly known as 厦門市鑫新景地房地產有限公司 v. ETON PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER

HCCT 54M/2007

Court of First Instance24 June 2008

HCCT000054M/2007 厦門新景地集團有限公司 formerly known as 厦門市鑫新景地房地產有限公司 v. ETON PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER

HCCT 54/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 54 OF 2007

_____________

	IN THE MATTER of Section 2GG and 40B of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 341)
	and
	IN THE MATTER of the Arbitration Award dated 27 October 2006 awarded by China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission

_____________

BETWEEN

	厦門新景地集團有限公司 formerly known as 厦門市鑫新景地房地產有限公司	Applicant
	and
	Eton Properties Limited (裕景興業有限公司)	1^st Respondent
	Eton Properties (Holdings) Limited (裕景興業(集團)有限公司)	2^nd Respondent

_____________

Before: Hon Reyes J in Chambers (Not open to public)

Date of Hearing: 19 June 2008

Date of Judgment: 24 June 2008

_______________

CORRIGENDA

_______________

Kindly note the following correction in the Judgment of the above case handed down by the Honourable Mr. Justice Reyes on 24^th June, 2008:-

Page 22, paragraph 90, line N, the word “principle” should read as“principles that”.

Page 27, paragraph 103, line between B & C, the word “Land” should read as “Legend”.

Page 31, paragraph 115, line E, the word “ha” should read as “has”.

Page 31, paragraph 115, line G, the word “ha” should read as “has”.

Page 31, paragraph 115, line I, the quotation paragraph number “35.” should read as “36.”.

Page 31, paragraph 115, line between I & J, the word “th” should read as “the”.

厦門新景地集團有限公司 formerly known as 厦門市鑫新景地房地產有限公司 v. ETON PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER

Citation

Court

Procedural posture

Issues

Holdings

Legal principles

Disposition