|
HCMP 1621/2024
[2025] HKCFI 2175
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1621 OF 2024
____________
| |
IN THE MATTER OF a Charging Order Absolute dated 21 September 2015 in DCMP 1695/2015, a Charging Order Absolute dated 8 April 2019 in DCCJ 5754/2016, a Charging Order Absolute dated 31 December 2018 in DCMP 2488/2018, a Charging Order Absolute dated 28 October 2019 in DCCJ 3885/2018, a Charging Order Absolute dated 20 December 2021 in DCMP 3877/2020, a Charging Order Absolute dated 17 January 2020 in DCMP 2857/2021, a Charging Order Absolute dated 29 August 2022 in DCMP 1982/2022, a Charging Order Absolute dated 24 April 2024 in DCMP 3007/2003, a Charging Order Absolute dated 29 April 2024 in DCMP 2708/2018, a Charging Order Absolute dated 17 June 2024 in DCMP 3381/2023 and a Charging Order Absolute dated 22 July 2024 in DCMP 4811/2023 |
| |
and |
| |
IN THE MATTER OF All that 2 equal undivided 90th part or share of and in all that piece or parcel of ground registered in the Land Registry as the Remaining Portion of Tai Wo Market Lot No. 58 in D.D. 6, the Remaining Portion of Tai Wo Market Lot No. 50 in D.D. 6, the Remaining Portion of Tai Wo Market Lot No. 48 in D.D. 6, the Remaining Portion of Tai Wo Market Lot No. 46 in D.D. 6, the Remaining Portion of Section A of Tai Wo Market Lot No. 46 in D.D. 6 and the Remaining Portion of Tai Wo Market Lot No. 44 in D.D. 6 and of the property known as Shop A on G/F, Wing Cheung Building, Nos. 6-14 Fu Shin Street, Tai Po, New Territories |
| |
and |
| |
IN THE MATTER OF Order 50 rule 9A and Order 88 rule 5A of the Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A) |
____________
|
BETWEEN
|
| |
SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
WONG SHUI KIU |
Defendant |
____________
| Before: |
Hon Cheng J in Chambers |
| Date of Hearing: |
21 May 2025 |
| Date of Decision: |
21 May 2025 |
_____________
D E C I S I O N
_____________
1. The Plaintiff issued an originating summons on 27th August 2024 seeking an order for delivery of vacant possession of the Defendant’s property and sale thereof pursuant to RHC O.50 r.9A and O.88 r.5A, in order to enforce eleven charging orders absolute.
2. The Defendant has not appeared in these proceedings so far. I am satisfied that he has been served with the Originating Summons, Notice of Appointment to Hear the Originating Summons regarding today’s hearing, and the Plaintiff’s 1st and 2nd affirmations in support of the Originating Summons.
3. I am satisfied that the Plaintiff’s affirmations have set out the matters as required under O.88 r.5A.
4. In the circumstances, I am satisfied that the Plaintiff is entitled to the relief sought, and I make an order in terms of the Originating Summons.
| |
(Yvonne Cheng)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court
|
Mr Nelson Lok of Gallant for the Plaintiff
The Defendant not represented and absent
|