MA CHUN MAN v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES

HCAL 979/2024

[2024] HKCFI 3531

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 979 OF 2024

_________________

_________________

______________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

______________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 6 December 2024:

1.  Page 15 at paragraph 27 line S, “a particular recidivist risks” should read as “a particular recidivist risk”.

2.  Page 17 at paragraph 29(b) line G, “is likely to commit” should read as “he is likely to commit”.

3.  Page 20 at paragraph 34 line G, “not a position” should read as “not in a position”.

4.  Page 35 at paragraph 61 line P, “cannot not in law granted” should read as “cannot in law grant”.

5.  Page 39 at paragraph 67(4) line H, “more probably than” should read as “more probable than”.

6.  Page 39 at paragraph 68 line J, “Applicant challenge” should read as “Applicant’s challenge”.

7.  Page 39 at paragraph 69 line R, “s69(4B) of the PR” should read as “r69(4B) of the PR”.

8.  Page 40 at paragraph 72(3) line R, “is to review of cases of” should read as “is to review cases of”.

9.  Page 40 at footnote 65 line T, “Superintendent Fung” should read as “Superintendent Lo”.

10.  Page 41 at paragraph 72(3) line B, “the prisoners concern” should read as “the prisoners concerned”.

11.  Page 45 at paragraph 79 line P, “r6(3A), PRSPO” should read as “s6(3A), PRSPO”.

12.  Page 52 at paragraph 88(ii) line P, “re-integrated to” should read as “re-integrate into”.

13.  Page 55 at paragraph 95 line I, “on the hand” should read as “on the one hand”.

14.  Page 55 at paragraph 95 line K, “Yeung VP” should read as “As Yeung VP”.

15.  Page 55 at paragraph 95 line M, “deprive his or her” should read as “deprive him or her”.

16.  Page 56 at paragraph 97 line I, “it can be seriously suggested” should read as “it cannot be seriously suggested”.

17.  Page 57 at paragraph 99 line O, “is cited with” should read as “was cited with”.

18.  Page 58 at paragraph 100 line D, “legal certainly” should read as “legal certainty”.

19.  Page 58 at paragraph 100(ii) line N, “treats to national security” should read as “threats to national security”.

20.  Page 62 at paragraph 107 line Q, “by virtue of s4 of the PRSPO” should read as “by virtue of s4 of the SNSO”.

21.  Page 80 at paragraph 143 line I, “this legal proceedings” should read as “these legal proceedings”.

22.  Page 82 at paragraph 148 line K, “I find Mr Ma’s evidence reliable” should read as “I find Mr Ma’s evidence unreliable”.

23.  Page 87 at paragraph 160 line J, “no actual prejudicial” should read as “no actual prejudice”.

24.  Page 87 at footnote 154 line T, “per Bokhary J” should read as “per Bokhary PJ”.

25.  Page 90 at paragraph 165 line C, “could have came” should read as “could have come”.

26.  Page 93 at paragraph 174 lines B and C, “judgment” should read as “judgement”.

27.  Page 93 at paragraph 175 line J, “judgment” should read as “judgement”.