葉慶祥 v. 香港特首林鄭月娥女士

[2019] HKCFI 2926

Court of First Instance27 November 2019

Judges:G Lam

HCAL2942/2019 葉慶祥 v. 香港特首林鄭月娥女士

HCAL 2942/2019

[2019] HKCFI 2926

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LISTNo.2942 of 2019

BETWEEN

	葉慶祥	Applicant
	及
	香港特首林鄭月娥女士	Putative Respondent

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review

NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3)

Following:

	consideration of the documents only; or
	consideration of the documents and oral submissions by the Applicant or counsel [ ] in open court;

Order by The Honourable Mr Justice G Lam :

The application for leave to apply for Judicial Review is dismissed.

Observations for the Applicant :

Having regard to the Court’s decision in HCAL 2945/2019 and HCAL 2949/2019, the present application is academic. Nor is the Form 86 supported by adequate reasoning. Accordingly, the application for leave is dismissed.

Dated the 27th day of November 2019.

	(Carol Yeung)
	for Registrar, High Court

Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence

Notes for the Applicant: If leave has been granted, the Applicant or his solicitors must:
a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted (Order 53, rule 4A); b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).		Sent/Handed to the Applicant/the Applicant’s solicitors on 28/11/2019 葉慶祥 The Applicant		Sent/Handed to the Putative Respondent/the Putative Respondent’s solicitors / such Putative interested parties as may be directed by the Court / the Putative interested parties’ solicitors on 28/11/2019 Department of Justice For the Putative Respondent Ref.: HCAL 2942/19

葉慶祥 v. 香港特首林鄭月娥女士

Citation

Court

Procedural posture

Issues

Holdings

Legal principles

Disposition

Key citations