WAN CHEE LEUNG v. LAM KI MAU AND ANOTHER t/a TOMSON CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CO

HCPI 95/2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 95 OF 2006

____________________

____________________

______________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

______________________

1. Paragraph 15,  page 4:-

‘In this case, there is diabolically opposed medical evidence concerning aspects of confabulation and exaggeration by the plaintiff.’  should be changed to ‘In this case, there is diametricallyopposed medical evidence concerning aspects of confabulation and exaggeration by the plaintiff.’

Dated the 2^nd day of June 2008