|
HCCW000166B/2000
HCCW 130/2000
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 130 OF 2000
____________
|
IN THE MATTER of the Companies Ordinance Cap. 32
and
IN THE MATTER of Wah Nam Group Limited
|
____________
| BETWEEN |
|
|
|
EXCEL NOBEL DEVELOPMENT LIMITED |
1st Petitioner |
|
UNBEATABLE ASSETS LIMITED |
2nd Petitioner |
|
|
|
|
AND |
|
|
|
|
|
WAH NAM GROUP LIMITED |
Respondent |
|
[Applicant in the summons]
|
|
____________
HCCW 166/2000
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 166 OF 2000
____________
|
IN THE MATTER of the Companies Ordinance Cap. 32
and
IN THE MATTER of Wah Nam Group Limited
|
|
|
| BETWEEN |
|
|
|
HCK CHINA INVESTMENTS LIMITED |
1st Petitioner |
|
INVESTMENT AUSTASIA LIMITED |
2nd Petitioner |
|
|
|
|
AND |
|
|
|
|
|
WAH NAM GROUP LIMITED |
Respondent |
|
[Applicant in the summons] |
|
(Heard together)
____________
Coram: Hon Yuen J in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 12 April 2000
Date of Decision: 12 April 2000
_______________
D E C I S I O N
_______________
1. This is an application for validation under Section 182 of the Companies Ordinance of the issue of new shares by the Company under a Subscription Agreement made between the Company and a company called China Zone Limited.
2. The proposed issue is of 150m. new shares of 10 cents each in the Company. At the moment, I am told that the net asset value of the Company is about 3 cents. It is not for me to speculate as to why this company, China Zone, would want to acquire shares in the Company in this way. The subscription moneys are payable in cash. On that basis alone, I would make an order in terms of paragraph 1 of the Summons issued by the Company on 28 March 2000, with the amendments to the schedule as shown in the letter from the Applicant's solicitors dated 6 April 2000, with the addition of the words "into court" after the words "Wah Nam" in the new paragraph (c) of the schedule.
3. I have been brought to a number of pieces of evidence which indicate that some of the evidence filed on behalf of the Company may raise certain suspicions. As I have said, the present order that I am making is made on the basis and on the basis alone of the benefit that would accrue to the Company from being able to get cash of $15m. Therefore, I would reserve any views that I may have on the propriety or otherwise of the acts of the Company in the past few months as indicated in the evidence before me.
|
(MARIA YUEN) |
|
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court |
Representation:
Mr Kenneth Chan, instructed by Messrs Siao, Wen & Leung, for the Respondent Company
Mr David McKellar, of Messrs Horvath & Giles, for the Petitioner in CW 130/2000
Mr Bernard Tam Tak Hing, of Messrs King & Co., for the Petitioner in CW 166/2000
Miss A Li from the Official Receiver's Office
|