|
HCMA001204/2002
HCMA 1204/2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 1204 OF 2002
(ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 3432/2002)
____________
| BETWEEN |
|
|
|
HKSAR |
Respondent |
|
|
|
|
AND |
|
|
|
|
|
CHENG KAM WAH |
Appellant |
____________
Coram: Deputy High Court Judge Line in Court
Date of Hearing: 14 January 2003
Date of Judgment: 14 January 2003
_______________
J U D G M E N T
_______________
1. This is an appeal against sentence. The appellant was sentenced to 6 months imprisonment following his plea of guilty to theft. He had stolen 8 bottles of shampoo from Mannings. He has 24 previous convictions of which 13 are the theft.
2. The Magistrate took a starting point of 9 months. That was higher than usual but it reflected the fact that this was an habitual offender who chooses to steal shampoo he can resell for money.
3. In my judgment, the Magistrate was fully entitled to take 9 months for the starting point on these facts for this man. The greater starting point is not disproportionate to the mischief of the crime. He gave a full 1/3 discount for the plea of guilty and the resulting sentence of 6 months imprisonment is one that I judge to be just in the circumstances.
4. Accordingly, I confirm the sentence passed by the Magistrate.
|
(Peter Line) |
|
Deputy High Court Judge |
Representation:
Ms Jasmine Ching, GC, Department of Justice, for HKSAR
Appellant: Cheng Kam Wah, in person
|