THE QUEEN v. HO CHUN MAN

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

Mayo JA:

1. It is convenient to deal with these two appeals together. In both cases the appellant pleaded guilty to being in possession of small quantities of dangerous drugs. Each offence was separate and distinct and the learned magistrate passed consecutive sentence of six months' imprisonment for both offences.

2. The appellant has a long history of drug abuse. Unfortunately it would not appear to be feasible to order any other form of punishment than imprisonment. The terms of imprisonment ordered were in accordance with sentencing practice and indeed could in all the circumstances be considered as having been merciful.

3. Before me the appellant requested that I should suspend the sentences. Unfortunately I do not think that this is an option which is open to me in the circumstances of this case. I am of the opinion that there are no grounds for me to interfere with the sentence which was imposed. These appeals must be dismissed.