|
HCAL 61/2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST
NO. 61 OF 2003
____________
BETWEEN
| |
ANDERSON ASPHALT LIMITED,
ASPHALT SURFACES (INT’L) LIMITED,
PIONEER ASPHALTS (HONG KONG) LIMITED,
TARMAC ASPHALT HONG KONG LIMITED
|
Applicants |
| |
and |
|
| |
TOWN PLANNING BOARD |
1st Respondent |
| |
MAN FAI TAI ENTERPRISE LIMITED
trading as MAN WAH COMPANY
|
2nd Respondent |
____________
Before: Hon Chung J in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 21 July 2006
Date of Decision: 21 July 2006
___________________________
DECISION ON COSTS
___________________________
1. This is the 2nd respondent’s application for leave to appeal to Court of Appeal against the costs order absolute dated 1 June 2006 (and for related relief if leave is given).
2. Very briefly, I agree with the submissions of the applicants and disagree with those of the 2nd respondent.
3. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
| |
(Andrew Chung)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court |
Mr Anthony Ismail, instructed by Messrs Johnson, Stokes & Master, for the Applicants
Not appearing, of Secretary for Justice, for the 1st Respondent
Mr Alan Hoo, SC leading Mr Alfred Chan, instructed by Messrs Fred Kan & Co., for the 2nd Respondent
|