|
HCA 7769/2000 &
HCMP 3909/2000
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
ACTION NO. 7769 OF 2000
and
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 3909 OF 2000
____________
BETWEEN
| |
BANK OF CHINA
(HONG KONG) BRANCH |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
FU MING KONG
MICHAEL |
1st Defendant |
| |
FIRST CHINA
TRADING LIMITED |
2nd Defendant |
____________
(Consolidated pursuant to the Order of Master Wong dated 28th September 2001)
Before: Hon Chung J in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 17 August 2005
Date of Decision: 17 August 2005
_______________
D E C I S I O N
________________
1. This is the Defendants’ application for stay of execution of the judgment dated 8 July 2005 pending an appeal against the said judgment to the Court of Appeal. The said judgment was entered against the Defendants after a 13-day trial in respect of their indebtedness in the region of HK$14 million (and another sum of about $8.8 million by way of interest).
2. In support of this application, the Defendants have filed an affirmation of the 1st Defendant dated 4 August 2005. In short, 3 grounds are put forward:
| (a) |
the
Defendants’ appeal is meritorious and will most likely succeed; |
| |
|
| (b) |
the property
mortgaged to the Plaintiff has a market value of well over
$15 million. There is also a rising property market. The
Plaintiff is said to be not prejudiced by a delay in the sale of the
property. On the other hand, if the property is sold by way of
a forced sale, it is unlikely a reasonable price can be obtained; |
| |
|
| (c) |
it is unlikely
the Defendants can find a similar alternative property in the same
building or in the vicinity if the property is sold. |
3. The Plaintiff has helpfully provided a comprehensive skeleton submission to oppose this application. I entirely agree with it and will not repeat the points made therein.
4. Accordingly, I conclude that the grounds relied upon by the Defendants are inadequate to justify this application. It is therefore dismissed.
| |
(Andrew
Chung)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court |
Ms Mabel Kwan of Messrs Gallant Y T Ho & Co, for the Plaintiff
Mr John Ku of Messrs John Ku & Co, for the Defendants
|