|
HCCW 6/2018
[2020] HKCFI 2362
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES WINDING-UP PROCEEDINGS NO 6 OF 2018
________________________
| |
IN THE MATTER OF The Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance, Cap 32 |
| |
and |
| |
IN THE MATTER OF Wah Fook Hong International Company Limited (“the Company”) |
________________________
| Before: |
Hon Harris J in Court |
| Date of Hearing: |
4 September 2020 |
| Date of Decision: | 4 September 2020 |
________________________
D E C I S I O N
________________________
1. I have before me an application to stay the winding-up of the Company which was put into liquidation in March 2018. The application is straight forward.
2. The Company has two creditors, both of whom have been paid. It would appear that it has, in the form of a Mainland subsidiary, underlying assets which an investor wishes to acquire and for that purpose it is proposed that the liquidation is terminated. The liquidators have provided to the Official Receiver and the court a report. Neither the liquidators nor the Official Receiver suggest that there are any outstanding matters including action in respect of any director’s breach of duty that require action.
3. The principles that guide the court’s consideration of applications for a permanent stay of a winding-up are explained in various decisions. To succeed in the application, the burden is on the company to make out a sufficient case for a stay that carries conviction. The court considers:
(a) the interests of members creditors and the liquidator;
(b) whether the stay is conducive or detrimental to commercial morality and to the interest of the public at large; and
(c) whether if a stay is granted all creditors and potential outstanding liabilities of the company are provided for.
See: Re The Grande Holdings Ltd [1].
4. I am satisfied that this is an appropriate case for a permanent stay to be granted and I so order. I further order the liquidators namely, Huen Ho Yin and Huen Yuen Fun be discharged forthwith.
| |
(Jonathan Harris) |
| |
Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court |
Mr Avery Chan, instructed by Oldham, Li & Nie, for the petitioner
The attendance of Huen & Partners, for the joint and several liquidators, was excused
[1] (Unreported, HCCW 177/2011, 9 May 2016) at [2].
|