Case Details

Citation

PANCO INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LTD v. DING PENG AND OTHERS, HCCL 98E/1995

Case Number

HCCL 98E/1995

Court

Court of First Instance

(CFI)

Decision Date

30 January 2004

Parties

Applicant(s):

Prosperfield Ventures Limited

Respondent(s):

Tripole Trading Limited, Zheng Lie Lie, Ding Peng

For Applicant(s):

Mr Robert Whitehead, SC

Judges

Carlson

PANCO INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LTD v. DING PENG AND OTHERS

HCCL 98E/1995

Court of First Instance30 January 2004

Judges:Carlson

HCCL000098E/1995 PANCO INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LTD v. DING PENG AND OTHERS

HCCL000098E/1995

HCA5370/1993

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. HCA 5370 OF 1993

_______________________

BETWEEN
	Prosperfield Ventures Limited	Plaintiff

	AND

	Tripole Trading Limited	1st Defendant
	Zheng Lie Lie	2nd Defendant
	Ding Peng	4th Defendant

_______________________

Coram: Deputy High Court Judge Carlson in Court

Date of Hearing: 29 January 2004

Date of Decision: 30 January 2004

HCCL98/1995

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. HCCL 98 OF 1995

_______________________

BETWEEN
	Panco Industrial Holdings Limited	Plaintiff

	AND

	Ding Peng	1st Defendant
	Zheng Lie Lie	2nd Defendant
	Ng Hiu Nam	3rd Defendant
	Deng Liu Gen	4th Defendant
	China Projects Limited	5th Defendant
	Kenrey Finance Limited	6th Defendant

_______________________

Coram: Deputy High Court Judge Carlson in Court

Date of Hearing: 29 January 2004

Date of Decision: 30 January 2004

__________________

R U L I N G

__________________

1. I think Mrs Kaplan is right that these are discrete matters but I would characterise both the matter of 5 November and what has happened yesterday and today as applications that were perfectly reasonable in the circumstances of what was going on and what has happened following the judgment and so I think the fair order and the correct order is to say no order as to costs in respect of those two matters.

2. I have been referring to it variously as 5 November and the 19th day. But my clerk correctly points out that I delivered that ruling on 31 October as appears on the face of it which was the 19th day of the trial.

	(Ian Carlson)
	Deputy High Court Judge

Representation:

HCA 5370 of 1993

Mr Robert Whitehead, SC, instructed by Clifford Chance, for the Plaintiff Mrs Barbara Kaplan, instructed by Wong, Poon, Chan, Law & Co., for D1, D2 & D4

HCCL 98 of 1995

Mr Robert Whitehead, SC, instructed by Clifford Chance, for the Plaintiff Mrs Barbara Kaplan, instructed by Wong, Poon, Chan, Law & Co., for D1, D2 & D5

PANCO INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LTD v. DING PENG AND OTHERS

Court

Procedural posture

Issues

Holdings

Legal principles

Disposition