|
HCAL 2209/2019
[2024] HKCFI 3436
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 2209 of 2019
| BETWEEN |
|
|
|
Md Awlad Hossain |
Applicant |
|
and
|
|
|
Director of Immigration |
Putative Interested Party |
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3)
Following;
Order by Deputy High Court Judge K.W. Lung:
1. Leave to apply for judicial review of the Director’s decision in his letter dated 25 July 2019 be granted.
2. The applicant shall issue the originating summons for hearing within 14 days from the date of this Order, pursuant to Order 53, rule 5 of the Rules of the High Court.
3. A copy of this Order be served on the Director of Justice, who shall work out the proper directions for the judicial review hearing with the applicant.
4. Liberty to apply.
Observations for the Applicant:
1. This is the applicant’s application to review the Director’s letter dated 25 July 2019, in which the Director, having acknowledged the applicant’s letter of 5 July 2019 for withdrawing his subsequent claim application, said in the last sentence:
“This is to confirm our receipt of your said written notice of withdrawal of your non-refoulement claim. No further action will be taken by us on your non-refoulement claim.”
2. The applicant wished to re-open his application because he was informed that his problem remained after he had applied for withdrawal of his subsequent claim. He took it that the Director had refused his application.
3. Section 37ZP of the Ordinance provides, inter alia:
“(1) (b). all of the other provisions of this Part apply to a subsequent claim as they apply to any other torture claim.”
4. Section 37ZE of the Ordinance provides that the applicant may, subject to the conditions therein provided, apply to re-open his subsequent claim application. In other words, if the applicant applies to re-open his subsequent claim, the Director has to consider his application. It is in this respect the last sentence of the Director’s letter dated 25 July 2019 is an error in law.
5. I shall give leave to apply for judicial review of the Director’s decision in his letter dated 25 July 2019.
6. The applicant shall issue the originating summons for hearing within 14 days from the date of this Order, pursuant to Order 53, rule 5 of the Rules of the High Court.
7. A copy of this Order be served on the Director of Justice, who shall work out the proper directions for the judicial review hearing with the applicant.
8. Liberty to apply.
Dated the 17th day of December 2024
| |
(M.O. WONG)(Ms)
for Registrar, High Court |
Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence
Notes for the Applicant:
If leave has been granted, the Applicant or the Applicant’s solicitors must:
|
|
|
|
|
a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted (Order 53, rule 4A);
b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and
c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).
|
|
Sent to the Applicant
on 17/12/2024
Md Awlad Hossain
Applicant’s ref. no:
Nil
|
|
Sent to the Putative Respondent / the Putative Respondent’s solicitors / such Putative Interested Parties as may be directed by the Court / the Putative Interested Parties’ solicitors on 17/12/2024
Director of Immigration
Putative Interested Party’s ref. no.: L/M (19787) in ImmD RA 7/37/C (Formerly RBCZ 523/14, RBCZ 9002563/17)
Department of Justice,
Senior Assistant Law Officer
(Civil Law)
(Civil Litigation Unit 2)
|
Form CALL-1
|