NISA AZIZAN v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION

[2018] HKCFI 136 · HCAL 57/2018

Court of First Instance24 January 2018

HCAL57/2018 NISA AZIZAN v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION

HCAL57/2018
[2018] HKCFI 136

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 57 of 2018

BETWEEN

	Nisa Azizan	Applicant
	and
	Director of Immigration	Putative Respondent

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review

NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3)

Following;

	consideration of the documents only; or
	consideration of the documents and oral submissions by the Applicant or counsel [ ] in open court;

Order by the Honourable Mr Justice Chow:

Leave to apply for Judicial Review dismissed.

Observations for the Applicant:

The application for leave to apply for judicial review is dismissed on the ground the application is not reasonably arguable. The Applicant’s limit of stay already expired on 29 May 2011. No proper ground has been stated, or disclosed, in the Notice of Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review dated 11 January 2018 or the Applicant’s Affirmation made on 11 January 2018 which would justify the court reviewing the decision of the Director of Immigration not to grant to the Applicant an extension of stay.

Dated the 24^th day of January 2018.

	(Sunny Ng)
	for Registrar, High Court

Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence

Notes for the Applicant: If leave has been granted, the Applicant or his solicitors must:
a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted(Order 53, rule 4A);	Sent/Handed to the Applicant/ the Applicant’s solicitors on 25/01/2018 Nisa Azizan The Applicant	Sent/Handed to the Putative Respondent/ the Putative Respondent’s solicitors / such Putative Interested Parties as may be directed by the Court / the Putative Interested Parties’ solicitors on 25/01/2018

b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and		Director of Immigration The Putative Respondent Ref: ACCS-19-15 & ACCS 20-15

c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).

NISA AZIZAN v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION

Citation

Court

Procedural posture

Issues

Holdings

Legal principles

Disposition