Case Details

Citation

TSUI KOON TIN AND OTHERS v. THE BUILDING AUTHORITY, CACV 354M/2002

Case Number

CACV 354M/2002

Court

Court of Appeal

(CA)

Decision Date

24 May 2006

Parties

Applicant(s):

TSUI KOON TIN 1st Applicant HAU TAK HO 2nd Applicant WANG TSUNG CHANG 3rd Applicant YIU WAH KAM 4th Applicant SIU FUNG KUEN 5th Applicant CHOW MEI, TSUI KOON TIN, HAU TAK HO, WANG TSUNG CHANG, YIU WAH KAM, SIU FUNG KUEN, CHOW MEI

Respondent(s):

THE BUILDING AUTHORITY

TSUI KOON TIN AND OTHERS v. THE BUILDING AUTHORITY

CACV 354M/2002

Court of Appeal24 May 2006

CACV000354M/2002 TSUI KOON TIN AND OTHERS v. THE BUILDING AUTHORITY

CACV 354/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 354 OF 2002

(ON APPEAL FROM HCAL NO. 161 OF 2002)

______________

	IN THE MATTER of Application by TSUI KOON TIN
	HAU TAK HO
	WANG TSUNG CHANG
	YIU WAH KAM
	SIU FUNG KUEN
	CHOW MEI
	for leave to apply for Judicial Review
	And
	IN THE MATTER of decisions dated 6/6/2002 and 29/7/2002 of the Building Authority

______________

BETWEEN

	TSUI KOON TIN	1^st Applicant
	HAU TAK HO	2^nd Applicant
	WANG TSUNG CHANG	3^rd Applicant
	YIU WAH KAM	4^th Applicant
	SIU FUNG KUEN	5^th Applicant
	CHOW MEI	6^th Applicant
	and
	THE BUILDING AUTHORITY	Respondent

______________

Before: Hon Cheung and Tang JJA in Court

Date of Hearing: 17 May 2006

Date of Judgment: 24 May 2006

_____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_____________________

1. ( On page 5 at paragraph 12, the first sentence should read :

“In April 2001, a new policy called “A Comprehensive Strategy for Building Safety and Timely Maintenance Implementation Plan” (“the 2001 policy”) was published.

Dated the 29th day of September, 2006.

(Janet Kwan) (Ms.)
Clerk to the Honourable Mr. Justice Tang,
Justice of Appeal

Citation

Court

Procedural posture

Issues

Holdings

Legal principles

Disposition

Appeal history

HCAL 161/2002
Judgment not in library
On appeal from
TSUI KOON TIN AND OTHERS v. THE BUILDING AUTHORITY
CA · 24 May 2006
This judgment