|
DCCC703/2012
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 703 OF 2012
----------------------
| |
HKSAR |
|
| |
v. |
|
| |
Wu Ka-yin |
|
| ---------------------- |
| Date: |
3 October 2012 at 11.45 am |
| Present: |
Ms Janice Cheuk, PP, of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR |
| |
Mr Lee Tak-tung, Paul, instructed by Messrs Thomas Li & Yu, for the Defendant |
| Offence: |
Trafficking in a dangerous drug (販運危險藥物) |
---------------------
Reasons for Sentence
---------------------
1. The defendant has pleaded guilty to a charge of trafficking in 38.45 grammes of ketamine.
2. Just before 7 o’clock on the evening of 5 June 2012, officers were conducting an anti-crime patrol outside Mei Lam Commercial Complex when they noticed the defendant behaving suspiciously. He was stopped and searched, and the drugs, subject to the charge, were found in his possession.
3. The defendant admitted to the police that he had been to Shenzhen through Lowu Terminal at 10 am in mid-May and bought 2 ounces of ketamine from a person called Ah Lung for 2,800 renminbi. He said that he bought the drugs for his own consumption. He said he put the ketamine in his underpants and returned to Hong Kong through Lok Ma Chau at about 1 am to 2 am on the following day and placed the ketamine at his home.
4. He was arrested and cautioned and under caution said the ketamine was for his own consumption. And later when given the opportunity to make a cautioned statement, he remained silent.
5. The only matter recorded on his record was a conviction in 2007 for possession of infringing products for which he was given a 150-hour community service order.
6. The defendant is aged 26. He was born in Shenzhen and came to Hong Kong when he was 3. He was educated to Secondary 3 level but later went on a vocational council course in car repairing. He lives with his mother. He has two older siblings but they live apart from the family. Apparently, he has had a drug habit involving ketamine since 2004 and takes ketamine on a daily basis.
7. In mitigation, his counsel has frankly admitted that the defendant has told him that on the day in question he was acting as a courier in respect of the drugs in his possession. He intended to give the drugs to somebody else but was arrested before he was able to do so.
8. I am told by his counsel that he wished to be helpful with the police but genuinely did not know the name or details of the person who would receive the drugs from him.
9. A letter has been handed by the defendant to the court in which he states he is very remorseful and ashamed of his behaviour.
10. Whilst in custody, he has had an opportunity of reflecting on his situation and has promised to reform and get proper work when he is eventually released.
11. As counsel has quite rightly pointed out, there are no aggravating features which would increase the usual sentence passed for persons in possession of this quantity of ketamine.
12. He has pleaded guilty as soon as he was in receipt of sensible legal advice and is deserving of receiving a full discount for that plea.
13. A starting point for this offence is 5 years’ imprisonment, and I reduce that by one-third to reflect the guilty plea. He will go to prison, therefore, for 40 months.
|