SMJ
HCMH 30M/2014
HCMH 30/2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
MENTAL HEALTH CASE NO. 30 OF 2014
____________
IN THE MATTER of Part II of the Mental Health Ordinance, Cap. 136 (“the Ordinance”)
and
IN THE MATTER of an alleged mentally incapacitated person SMJ
____________________
C O R R I G E N D U M
Page 8, paragraph 29, line D:
“Some practitioners may not be familiar with the subject, but clients are regarded as providers of continuing professional development for the lawyers.” should read as “Some practitioners may not be familiar with the subject, but clients are not regarded as providers of continuing professional development for the lawyers.”
Dated the 31st day of May, 2016.