|
CACC 198/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
criminal APPEAL NO. 198 OF 2004
(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 216 of 2003)
____________________
BETWEEN
| |
HKSAR |
Respondent |
| |
and |
|
| |
LEE KWAN KONG (D1) (李崑崗) |
1st
Applicant |
| |
LAM WAI KIT (D3) (林偉傑) |
2nd
Applicant |
____________________
Before: Hon Stuart-Moore VP, Stock JA and Burrell J
Date of Hearing: 21 February 2006
Date of Judgment: 21 February 2006
______________________
J U D G M E N T
______________________
Stuart-Moore, VP (giving the judgment of the Court):
1. This is an application for a certificate, pursuant to section 32(2) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484, that a point of law of great and general importance was involved in the judgment of this court which was handed down on 1 February 2006.
2. The proposed question of law, as set out in the Notice of Motion dated 11 February 2006, is as follows:
“Whether a direction along the lines recommended in R v. Nedrick [1986] 83 Cr. App. P.267 and considered in R v. [Woollin] [1999] 1 A.C. 82 should be given in all murder case[s] where the Defendant may not have desired the result of his acts and it is common ground that there never was any intent to kill?”
3. We do not consider that a point of law of great and general importance arises from our decision. The law is well settled on this topic and it was applied to the facts of this case.
4. Accordingly, we decline to certify and the application is dismissed.
(M.
Stuart-Moore)
Vice-President |
(Frank
Stock)
Justice of Appeal |
(M.P.
Burrell)
Judge of the Court of First Instance,
High Court |
Mr Alain Sham, SADPP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent.
Mr Maurice P Tracy, instructed by Messrs J Chan, Yip, So & Partners (assigned by Director of Legal Aid), for the 1st Applicant (D1)
Mr Maurice P Tracy, instructed by Messrs Tung, Ng, Tse & Heung (assigned by Director of Legal Aid), for the 2nd Applicant (D3)
|