|
HCMP 3166/2014
[2019] HKCFI 2180
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 3166 OF 2014
________________________
| |
IN THE MATTER of JIANG YUAN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT LIMITED |
| |
and |
| |
IN THE MATTER of Section 724 of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) |
________________________
| BETWEEN |
|
|
| |
XU LIU CHUN |
Petitioner |
and |
| |
WU CHANG JIANG (吳長江) |
1st Respondent |
| |
JIANG YUAN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT LIMITED |
2nd Respondent |
| |
(江源國際發展有限公司) |
|
________________________
| Before: Hon Alex Lee J in Chambers (Open to Public) |
| Date of Hearing: 27 June 2019 |
| Date of Written Submission by the Petitioner: 28 August 2019 |
| Date of Written Submission by the 1st Respondent: 15 August 2019 |
| Date of Decision on Costs: 6 September 2019 |
________________________
DECISION ON COSTS
________________________
Introduction
1. On 27.6.2019, I refused the Plaintiff’s application to vary the costs order nisi made on by this court on 13 July 2018 by which the costs of the trial on the issue of liability is reserved pending the decision on quantum. I also awarded the Respondents costs of the application, the quantum of which to be assessed summary.
2. On 12 August 2019, solicitors acting for the Respondents filed a Statement of Costs seeking a total of $177,077. On 28 August 2019, solicitors acting for the Petitioner filed their objections supposing a total of not more than $71,67.66. I have considered both.
Summary assessment
3. By a broad brush approach, I am of the view that, since counsel was instructed and briefed to represent the Respondent at the application, items D2 (Perusal of documents by solicitors), D3 (Legal researches by solicitor) and E1 (Researching and preparation for hearing by solicitors) as claimed by the Respondents are excessive and therefore have to be reduced. I make no reductions in respect of other items listed on the Statement of Costs.
4. In my assessment, a reasonable sum of costs for the Respondents would be $115,000 and this is the amount I allow.
|
(Alex Lee) Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court |
Mr Jenkin Suen and Ms Tinny Chan, instructed by Simon C.W. Yung & Co., for the Petitioner
Mr Martin Wong, instructed by Chong & Partners LLP, for the 1st Respondent
|