|
CACV 208/2008, CACV 210/2008, CACV 211/2008, CACV 212/2008,
CACV 351/2008 AND CACV 352/2008
CACV 208/2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 208 OF 2008
(ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO. 2763 OF 2004)
----------------------
BETWEEN
| |
PACIFIC ELECTRIC WIRE
& CABLE COMPANY LIMITED |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
HARMUTTY LIMITED |
1st Defendant |
| |
HADDOWE LIMITED |
2nd Defendant |
| |
CASPARSON PROPERTIES LIMITED |
3rd Defendant |
| |
HU HUNG CHIU (胡洪九) |
4th Defendant |
| |
YIP CHI HUNG (葉稚雄) |
5th Defendant |
| |
CHUNG CHE LING (鍾子陵) |
6th Defendant |
| |
TUNG YU JEH (仝玉潔) |
7th Defendant |
| |
SUN TAO TSUN (孫道存) |
8th Defendant |
| |
TAM PUI NA, RAFIA (譚佩娜) |
9th Defendant |
| |
WONG KUN TO (黃勤道) |
10th Defendant |
| |
CHEUNG KWAN HUNG, ANTHONY
(張鈞鴻) |
11th Defendant |
| |
AFTERVILLE LIMITED |
12th Defendant |
| |
NEE SOON LIMITED |
13th Defendant |
| |
SHOWGROUND LIMITED |
14th Defendant |
| |
BERRIDALE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED |
15th Defendant |
| |
JUTECH INVESTMENTS LIMITED |
16th Defendant |
| |
ALL DRAGON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED |
17th Defendant |
| |
BLINCO ENTERPRISES LIMITED |
18th Defendant |
| |
PATAGONIA LIMITED |
19th Defendant |
| |
MA KAM FOOK, ROBERT (馬金福) |
20th Defendant |
| |
HU SUN MAR LI (胡孫瑪琍) |
21st Defendant |
----------------------
AND
CACV 210/2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 210 OF 2008
(ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO. 2203 OF 2004)
----------------------
BETWEEN
| |
PACIFIC ELECTRIC WIRE & CABLE COMPANY LIMITED |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
TEXAN MANAGEMENT LIMITED |
1st Defendant |
| |
CLIPPER INVESTMENT LIMITED
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS PACIFIC CAPITAL (INVESTMENT) LIMITED) |
2nd Defendant |
| |
PACIFIC CAPITAL (ASIA) LIMITED |
3rd Defendant |
| |
ALL DRAGON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED |
4th Defendant |
| |
PCL HOLDINGS LIMITED
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS PACIFIC CAPITAL (HOLDINGS) LIMITED) |
5th Defendant |
| |
LAIDLAW PACIFIC FINANCIAL SERVICES
(HOLDINGS) LIMITED
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS PACIFIC CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES (HOLDINGS) LIMITED) |
6th Defendant |
| |
SUPER WISH LIMITED |
7th Defendant |
| |
HU HUNG CHIU(胡洪九) |
8th Defendant |
| |
WONG KUN TO(黃勤道) |
9th Defendant |
| |
CHEUNG KWAN HUNG, ANTHONY(張鈞鴻) |
10th Defendant |
| |
MA KAM FOOK, ROBERT(馬金褔) |
11th Defendant |
| |
CHENG SHU WING(鄭樹榮) |
12th Defendant |
| |
TUNG YU JEH(仝玉潔) |
13th Defendant |
| |
SUN TAO TSUN(孫道存) |
14th Defendant |
| |
PANG HONG(龐鴻) |
15th Defendant |
----------------------
AND
CACV 211/2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 211 OF 2008
(ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO. 2746 OF 2004)
----------------------
BETWEEN
| |
PACIFIC ELECTRIC WIRE & CABLE COMPANY LIMITED |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
GOLD GLOBAL LIMITED |
1st Defendant |
| |
PCL NOMINEES LIMITED |
2nd Defendant |
| |
GREATEAM LIMITED |
3rd Defendant |
| |
HU HUNG CHIU(胡洪九) |
4th Defendant |
| |
CHUNG CHE LING(鍾子陵) |
5th Defendant |
| |
YIP CHI HUNG(葉稚雄) |
6th Defendant |
| |
TAM PUI NA, RAFIA(譚佩娜) |
7th Defendant |
| |
HARMUTTY LIMITED |
8th Defendant |
----------------------
AND
CACV 212/2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 212 OF 2008
(ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO. 2763 OF 2004)
----------------------
BETWEEN
| |
PACIFIC ELECTRIC WIRE & CABLE COMPANY LIMITED |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
HARMUTTY LIMITED |
1st Defendant |
| |
HADDOWE LIMITED |
2nd Defendant |
| |
CASPARSON PROPERTIES LIMITED |
3rd Defendant |
| |
HU HUNG CHIU(胡洪九) |
4th Defendant |
| |
YIP CHI HUNG(葉稚雄) |
5th Defendant |
| |
CHUNG CHE LING(鍾子陵) |
6th Defendant |
| |
TUNG YU JEH(仝玉潔) |
7th Defendant |
| |
SUN TAO TSUN(孫道存) |
8th Defendant |
| |
TAM PUI NA, RAFIA(譚佩娜) |
9th Defendant |
| |
WONG KUN TO(黃勤道) |
10th Defendant |
| |
CHEUNG KWAN HUNG, ANTHONY(張鈞鴻) |
11th Defendant |
| |
AFTERVILLE LIMITED |
12th Defendant |
| |
NEE SOON LIMITED |
13th Defendant |
| |
SHOWGROUND LIMITED |
14th Defendant |
| |
BERRIDALE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED |
15th Defendant |
| |
JUTECH INVESTMENTS LIMITED |
16th Defendant |
| |
ALL DRAGON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED |
17th Defendant |
| |
BLINCO ENTERPRISES LIMITED |
18th Defendant |
| |
PATAGONIA LIMITED |
19th Defendant |
| |
MA KAM FOOK, ROBERT(馬金褔) |
20th Defendant |
| |
HU SUN MAR LI(胡孫瑪琍) |
21st Defendant |
----------------------
AND
CACV 351/2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 351 OF 2008
(ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO. 2746 OF 2004)
----------------------
BETWEEN
| |
PACIFIC ELECTRIC WIRE & CABLE
COMPANY LIMITED |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
GOLD GLOBAL LIMITED |
1st Defendant |
| |
PCL NOMINEES LIMITED |
2nd Defendant |
| |
GREATEAM LIMITED |
3rd Defendant |
| |
HU HUNG CHIU(胡洪九) |
4th Defendant |
| |
CHUNG CHE LING(鍾子陵) |
5th Defendant |
| |
YIP CHI HUNG(葉稚雄) |
6th Defendant |
| |
TAM PUI NA, RAFIA(譚佩娜) |
7th Defendant |
| |
HARMUTTY LIMITED |
8th Defendant |
----------------------
AND
CACV 352/2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 352 OF 2008
(ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO. 2763 OF 2004)
----------------------
BETWEEN
| |
PACIFIC ELECTRIC WIRE & CABLE COMPANY LIMITED |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
HARMUTTY LIMITED |
1st Defendant |
| |
HADDOWE LIMITED |
2nd Defendant |
| |
CASPARSON PROPERTIES LIMITED |
3rd Defendant |
| |
HU HUNG CHIU(胡洪九) |
4th Defendant |
| |
YIP CHI HUNG(葉稚雄) |
5th Defendant |
| |
CHUNG CHE LING(鍾子陵) |
6th Defendant |
| |
TUNG YU JEH(仝玉潔) |
7th Defendant |
| |
SUN TAO TSUN(孫道存) |
8th Defendant |
| |
TAM PUI NA, RAFIA(譚佩娜) |
9th Defendant |
| |
WONG KUN TO(黃勤道) |
10th Defendant |
| |
CHEUNG KWAN HUNG, ANTHONY(張鈞鴻) |
11th Defendant |
| |
AFTERVILLE LIMITED |
12th Defendant |
| |
NEE SOON LIMITED |
13th Defendant |
| |
SHOWGROUND LIMITED |
14th Defendant |
| |
BERRIDALE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED |
15th Defendant |
| |
JUTECH INVESTMENTS LIMITED |
16th Defendant |
| |
ALL DRAGON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED |
17th Defendant |
| |
BLINCO ENTERPRISES LIMITED |
18th Defendant |
| |
PATAGONIA LIMITED |
19th Defendant |
| |
MA KAM FOOK, ROBERT (馬金褔) |
20th Defendant |
| |
HU SUN MAR LI (胡孫瑪琍) |
21st Defendant |
----------------------
(Heard together)
Before: Hon Rogers VP and Le Pichon JA in Court
Date of Hearing: 5 June 2009
Date of Judgment: 5 June 2009
--------------------------
J U D G M E N T
------------------------
Hon Rogers VP:
1. In this case, this Court has made clear that, quite apart from anything else, it does not consider that this matter was fit for Order 14. So if one considers the criteria for granting leave in interlocutory appeals, I regret that whether or not there is a question of great general or public importance as regards whether the exact wording of Order 14 rule 1(2) and the exclusion of actions which include a claim by the Plaintiff based on an allegation of fraud and whether that means that an Order 14 application can be made, notwithstanding that the underlying root cause of the action as pleaded is based on fraud, or whether, as the Plaintiff says, it can seek ancillary relief, even though it says that it does not rely on the allegation of fraud, that is a matter in respect of which I would not give leave to appeal.
2. When the matter is considered in the round, even if that is taken to the Court of Final Appeal, there remains the matter as to whether this action was fit for an Order 14 application. This Court was clearly of the view that it was not.
3. In that case, it seems to me that it would be wholly academic to give leave and I, for my part, would not be prepared to give leave.
Hon Le Pichon JA:
4. I agree.
| (Anthony Rogers) |
(Doreen Le Pichon) |
| Vice-President |
Justice of Appeal |
Mr Anthony Neoh SC and Ms Barbara Wong, instructed by Messrs W K To & Co., for the Plaintiff/Applicant in all appeals (“PEWC”)
Mr Clifford Smith SC and Ms Rachel Lam, instructed by Messrs Tanner De Witt, for the 18th and 19th Defendants in CACV 208/2008/Respondents (“Blinco & Patagonia”)
Mr Simon Westbrook SC and Mr Jeevan Hingorani, instructed by Messrs Gall & Lane, for the 1st, 3rd, 4th and 7th Defendants in CACV 210/2008; the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 8th Defendants in CACV 211/2008; and the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 17th Defendants in CACV 212/2008/Respondents (“the Corporate Defendants”)
Mr Robert Whitehead SC and Mr Steven Kwan, instructed by Messrs Haldanes, for the 4th Defendant in CACV 208, 211, 212, 351 and 352/2008; and the 8th Defendant in CACV 210/2008/Intervener (“Mr Hu”)
Mr Edward Alder, instructed by Messrs Kennedys, for the Joint and Several Receivers of the 2nd and 3rd Defendants in CACV 208/2008; the 5th Defendant in CACV 210/2008; and the 3rd Defendant in CACV 211/2008
Application for leave to appeal by the plaintiff dismissed by Court of Final Appeal. Please refer to FAMV28/2009 to FAMV33/2009 dated 14 September 2009
|