|
HCMA000081/1996
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG
(Appellate Jurisdiction)
MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.81 OF 1996
--------------------
| BETWEEN |
|
|
|
THE QUEEN |
Respondent |
|
|
|
|
AND |
|
|
|
|
|
PAK KWAN HO |
Appellant |
--------------------
Coram : Hon Duffy, J. in Court
Date of hearing : 9 February 1996
Date of handing down judgment : 15 February 1996
-------------------------
J U D G M E N T
-------------------------
1. This was an appeal against a conviction for speeding. The method of assessing the speed of the appellant's vehicle was by the use of the frozen speedometer on a police motor cycle. The appellant's speed was assessed at 114km/hr. In the course of the appeal, I was advised that when dealing with radar speed checks, the police invariably make a 10% allowance for error. This matter was not considered in this case. It seemed to me that the learned Magistrate ought to have made an allowance for error of at least 5% in this case. She did not do so. Had she done so, she could have found that the appellant's speed was less than 110km/hr. That would have meant that the appellant's speed could be assessed between 15 and 30km/hr more than the speed limit. That speeding offence attracts a three rather than a five points penalty. I therefore allowed the appeal, and substituted the finding that the appellant was driving at a speed 15 to 30km/hr in excess of the speed limit.
2. Because of that, I also felt it right to remove the order for costs. I therefore allowed the appellant to appeal against sentence out of time and removed the order for costs.
Representation:
Mr Wesley W.C. Wong, S.C.C., for Crown
Appellant (Pak Kwan Ho) in person
|
(J.M. Duffy) |
|
Judge of the High Court |
|