|
CACC 147/2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. CACC 147 OF 2003
(ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO. 167 OF 2002)
____________
BETWEEN
| |
HKSAR |
Respondent |
|
and
|
| |
Ooi Lim Khoon |
Applicant |
____________
Before: Hon Stock VP and Hon McWalters J in Court
Date of Hearing: 24 August 2011
Date of Judgment: 24 August 2011
-------------------------------
C O R R I G E N D U M
-------------------------------
The paragraph 11 on page 5,
“This was clearly explained in the definitive judgment on this issue, a decision of this Court in HKSAR v Lai Siu Cheung [2004] 3 HKLRD 1.”
should read
“This was clearly explained in the definitive judgment on this issue, a decision of this Court in HKSAR v Lai Siu Cheung [2005] 1 HKLRD 1.”
The paragraph 14 on page 6,
This was explained by the Court of Appeal in the Lai Siu Cheung decision when it said at page 116 that nullity situations typically :
“intend to concern the applicant’s understanding of the effect or consequences of the document he is signing or, perhaps, misapprehending the effect of an appeal were he to persist.”
should read
This was explained by the Court of Appeal in the Lai Siu Cheung decision when it said at page 11G that nullity situations typically :
“tend to concern the applicant’s understanding of the effect or consequences of the document he is signing or, perhaps, misapprehending the effect of an appeal were he to persist.”
Dated this 24nd day of October 2011.
|
(Danny Tse)
Clerk to Hon McWalters J |
|