|
HCMP 1582/2019
[2021] HKCFI 1330
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 1582 OF 2019
____________
| |
IN THE MATTER of the estate of MOK YUEN KWAN(莫婉君), late of 1st Floor, Block C, Jade Forest Villa, No 74 Tung Tsz, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong, deceased |
| |
and |
| |
IN THE MATTER of Order 85 of the Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A) |
| |
and |
| |
IN THE MATTER of Section 33(3) of the Probate and Administration Ordinance (Cap 10) |
_____________
| BETWEEN |
|
|
| |
WONG CHIU WING(黃昭穎) |
Plaintiff |
and |
| |
WONG SIU WAH(黃兆華) |
Defendant |
_____________
Before: Hon K Yeung J in Chambers
Date of Submissions on Costs by the Plaintiff: 21 April 2021
Date of Submissions on Costs by the Defendant: 21 April 2021
Date of Reply Submissions by the Plaintiff: 28 April 2021
Date of Decision on Costs: 11 May 2021
_______________________
DECISION ON COSTS
_______________________
1. I refer to my Decision of 14 October 2020. The matter has since been settled. I am now requested to deal with the part of the costs that was reserved on the last occasion.
2. I have considered parties’ submissions. I agree that, despite the settlement, P is the effective winner. I also agree that P’s claim for costs against D was made under the 3rd class of cases referred to in Re Buckton [1907] 2 Ch 406[1], a class where the application to the court is made by a beneficiary but is, in substance although not in form, an adverse claim made in hostile litigation. I accept Mr Ho’s submissions that the costs should not be paid out of the estate. I order that the costs concerned should be paid by D.
3. On quantum, I find the total sum of HK$276,450 excessive. I find Items C1 and C2 (attendance on client and the other side) of 20 hours in total in particular excessive. I also find Item D1 (12 hours of preparation of documents) in particular excessive. Adopting a broad brush approach, I assess the total costs at HK$130,000. This is on top of the sum of HK$70,000 summarily assessed on the last occasion.
|
(Keith Yeung) Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court |
Submissions on Costs and Reply Submissions by Mr Martin Ho,
instructed by Charles Yeung Clement Lam Liu & Yip, for the Plaintiff
Submissions on Costs by Matthew Ng & Co, for the Defendant
|