HKSAR v. SHAHID

HCMA 168/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2013

(ON APPEAL FROM ESCC NO. 1828 OF 2012)

____________

____________

-------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

-------------------------------

The paragraph 49 on page 20 Line C,

“It comes from New Zealand and is the decisions of its Supreme Court in R v Abdula [2011] NZSC 130.”

should read

“It comes from New Zealand and is the decision of its Supreme Court in R v Abdula [2011] NZSC 130.”

The paragraph 55 on page 23 Line R,

“… but it seems to me that that view does not necessarily have to be of the level.”

should read

“… but it seems to me that that view does not necessarily have to be of the level of belief.”

Dated this 18^th day of September 2013.