CHEUNG KIM CHAU v. LAU LUEN AND ANOTHER

HCA 1898M/2002

Court of First Instance22 December 2004

Judges:Tang

HCA001898M/2002 CHEUNG KIM CHAU v. LAU LUEN AND ANOTHER

HCA1898/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO.1898 OF 2002

-------------------------------

BETWEEN

-------------------------------

Before : Hon Tang J in Court

Date of Hearing : 23-26 and 30 November 2004

Date of Judgment : 22 December 2004

Date of Corrigendum : 17 February 2005

------------------------------------

C O R R I G E N D U M

-------------------------------------

1.	At paragraph 22 on page 7, the 3^rd & 4^th lines should read :
	“	the 2^nd Defendant could have done better”.

2.	At paragraph 26 on page 9, the 7^th line should read :
	“	for the total amount of $160,000”.

3.	At paragraph 33 on page 12, the 3^rd line should read :
	“	of bronze sensors and bronze and ceramic statutes”.

4.	At paragraph 40 on page 14, the 3^rd & 4^th lines should read :
	“	I have no doubt that he would have insisted, as he said he did in the presence of the plaintiff”.

5.	At paragraph 42 on page 15, the 8^th & 9th lines should read :
	“	all these payments had been satisfactorily accounted for”.

6.	At paragraph 51 on page 17, the 8^th & 9^th lines should read :
	“	apparently a one-month supply of small change”.

7.	At paragraph 64 on page 23, the 10^th line should read :
	“	The 1^st defendant’s explanation as to the paid capital”.

8.	At paragraph 65 on page 24, the 8^th line should read :
	“	for breach of that agreement even though”.

9.	At paragraph 65 on page 24, the 13^th & 14^th lines should read :
	“	the plaintiff had failed to prove”.

	(Janet KWAN)
	for Registrar, High Court