THE QUEEN v. VU THI KHANH

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

-----------------

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

Liu JA:

1. The applicant was charged in the District Court with trafficking in a dangerous drug. The case against her was that on 11 October 1995 in the Refugee Centre, Castle Peak, she trafficked in a drug containing 15.32 gms of heroin hydrochloride in a mixture of 15.52 gms.

2. She was duly convicted by the judge and sentenced to 5 years' imprisonment on 27 March 1996. The applicant feels aggrieved by the sentence and she seeks leave to appeal against it. In her home-made application for leave to appeal against sentence, she complains of the long prison term. She informs the court that she has two very young children to care for. Her husband has deserted her since 1990. She begs to be given another chance so that she may go back to her children.

3. All these matters were duly taken into consideration by the judge. For the quantity of drug in which she was trafficking, the judge gave the applicant the lowest possible term of imprisonment. The quantity called for a sentence, ranging from 5 to 8 years. She was given 5.

4. The applicant was herself a drug dependant. Her social background was likewise taken into consideration. The judge also bore in mind her 17 previous convictions involving dishonesty possession of dangerous drugs and possession of dutiable goods.

5. There is clearly no substance in her application. Her application for leave to appeal against sentence must therefore be dismissed.