|
CACC 91/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 91 OF 2011
(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC No. 649 of 2010)
____________
BETWEEN
| |
HKSAR
|
Respondent |
| |
and
|
|
| |
HSU MING MEI (許明美) |
Applicant |
____________
Before : Hon Yeung VP, Lunn JA and Poon J in Court
Date of Hearing : 19 September 2012
Date of Judgment : 16 November 2012
__________________________
C O R R I G E N D A
__________________________
Please note the following Corrigenda to the Judgment:
the fourth line of paragraph 28, the fourth and fifth lines of paragraph 100 and the fifth line of paragraph 105, “principle” and “principle-protected” should read “principal” and “principal-protected” respectively;
the first and second lines of paragraph 92 should read “…in accessing the computer the applicant was motivated…” .
Dated this 28th day of December, 2012.
| |
(Kate Fan) |
| |
Clerk to the Hon. Lunn JA |
|