HKSAR v. LEUNG LONG YIN

HCMA 599/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 599 OF 2011

(ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 4715 OF 2010)

____________

____________

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1.  The Appellant was acquitted in the Magistrate’s Court on a charge of indecent assault but was refused costs because the Magistrate (Marco Li Esq.) took the view that he had brought suspicion upon himself. The Appellant now appeals against that refusal of costs.

2.  The refusal of costs was based to a material extent on the Appellant’s failure to proclaim his innocence at once.  In not doing that, the Appellant was exercising his right to silence.  A person’s exercise of his right of silence is not to be treated as bringing suspicion upon himself so as to justify depriving him of costs upon his acquittal.  

3.  The appeal is allowed to award the Appellant his trial costs. 

[The Appellant asked for his costs of the appeal and the Respondent did not oppose such costs.]

4.  I award the Appellant his costs of this appeal.