|
CACV 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240/2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF APPEAL
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240 OF 2006
(ON APPEAL FROM HCAJ NOS. 150, 151, 153, 268, 270, 271, 272 OF 2003)
______________________
CACV 234/2006
ADMIRALTY ACTION IN REM AGAINST THE SHIP OR VESSEL
“CONVENIENCE CONTAINER” (SINGAPORE FLAG)
BETWEEN
| |
INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICE INC. |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
THE OWNERS AND/OR DEMISE CHARTERERS
OF THE SHIP OR VESSEL
“CONVENIENCE CONTAINER”
|
Defendants
|
| |
and |
|
| |
FLORENS CONTAINER INC. |
Intervener |
______________________
CACV 235/2006
ADMIRALTY ACTION IN REM AGAINST THE SHIP OR VESSEL
“KINGDOM CONTAINER” (SINGAPORE FLAG)
BETWEEN
| |
INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICE INC. |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
THE OWNERS AND/OR DEMISE CHARTERERS
OF THE SHIP OR VESSEL
“KINGDOM CONTAINER”
|
Defendants
|
| |
and |
|
| |
FLORENS CONTAINER INC. |
Intervener |
______________________
CACV 236/2006
ADMIRALTY ACTION IN REM AGAINST THE SHIP OR VESSEL
“LIBERTY CONTAINER” (SINGAPORE FLAG)
BETWEEN
| |
INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICE INC. |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
THE OWNERS AND/OR DEMISE CHARTERERS
OF THE SHIP OR VESSEL
“LIBERTY CONTAINER”
|
Defendants
|
| |
and |
|
| |
FLORENS CONTAINER INC. |
Intervener |
______________________
CACV 237/2006
ADMIRALTY ACTION IN REM AGAINST THE SHIP OR VESSEL
“CONVENIENCE CONTAINER” (SINGAPORE FLAG)
BETWEEN
| |
RUDOLF A. OETKER KG |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
THE OWNERS AND/OR DEMISE CHARTERERS
OF THE SHIP OR VESSEL
“CONVENIENCE CONTAINER”
|
Defendants
|
______________________
CACV 238/2006
ADMIRALTY ACTION IN REM AGAINST THE SHIP OR VESSEL
“KINGDOM CONTAINER” (SINGAPORE FLAG)
BETWEEN
| |
RUDOLF A. OETKER KG |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
THE OWNERS AND/OR DEMISE CHARTERERS
OF THE SHIP OR VESSEL
“KINGDOM CONTAINER”
|
Defendants
|
______________________
CACV 239/2006
ADMIRALTY ACTION IN REM AGAINST THE SHIP OR VESSEL
“LIBERTY CONTAINER” (SINGAPORE FLAG)
BETWEEN
| |
RUDOLF A. OETKER KG |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
THE OWNERS AND/OR DEMISE CHARTERERS
OF THE SHIP OR VESSEL
“LIBERTY CONTAINER”
|
Defendants
|
______________________
CACV 240/2006
ADMIRALTY ACTION IN REM AGAINST THE SHIP OR VESSEL
“MANDARIN CONTAINER” (SINGAPORE FLAG)
BETWEEN
| |
RUDOLF A. OETKER KG |
Plaintiff |
| |
and |
|
| |
THE OWNERS AND/OR DEMISE CHARTERERS
OF THE SHIP OR VESSEL
“MANDARIN CONTAINER”
|
Defendants
|
______________________
Before : Hon Ma CJHC, Stone & Reyes JJ in Court
Dates of Hearing : 12 and 13 June 2007
Date of Handing Down Judgment : 16 July 2007
______________________
C O R R I G E N D U M
______________________
In paragraph 138, 5th line:
Replace ‘of’ with ‘as’, so that the sentence reads:
“continues to regard the fund representing the sale proceeds (less expenses) as “the ship”, and…”
Dated this 27th day of August, 2007
| |
(T. LO)(Miss)
Clerk to Hon Stone, J |
|