Personal Representative of TANG KIN MAN, deceased v. KWOK YU PING AND OTHERS

HCPI 378/2005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 378 OF 2005

____________________

____________________

_______________

CORRIGENDA

_______________

Please note that some corrections have been made to the Judgment and the revisions are as follows:

1.  Paragraph 21 should read “... From the papers it is quite obvious that the former solicitors for the Plaintiff, i.e., those who have ceased to act were not aware of the necessity of making the application within the validity period of the writ under Order 15 rule 6A(4) until the 3^rd Defendant made an application to strike out on 26^th May 2006.  Obviously, it was a mistake on the part of the Plaintiff’s then legal advisors; ...”

2.  Paragraph 24(a) should read “As to the 3rd Defendant’s summons dated 26^th May 2006 to strike out, I make no order for reasons aforesaid;”

3.  Paragraph 24(d) should read “As to the Plaintiff’s application dated 21^st October 2006, I make order in term of paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of the Summons.”

Dated this 18^th December 2006