HKSAR v. ARSHAD MUHAMMAD

HCMA 649/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 649 OF 2010

(ON APPEAL FROM STCC NO. 310 OF 2010)

____________

BETWEEN

____________

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1.  The Magistrate sentenced the appellant correctly and she gave the appellant a credit for the period he had been in administrative custody as well as an additional one-month credit.

2.  It seems that the Magistrate gave the appellant the extra credit because the work he was doing was simple.  The appellant was sentenced correctly.  His appeal is dismissed.