|
FAMC No. 13 of 2022 and
FAMV No. 367 of 2022
[2022] HKCFA 19
IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 13 OF 2022 (CRIMINAL)
(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM
CACV NO. 103 OF 2022)
________________________
| BETWEEN |
|
|
|
THE SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE |
Applicant |
|
and |
|
|
TAM KIT-I |
Respondent |
________________________
AND
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 367 OF 2022 (CIVIL)
(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM
CACV NO. 103 OF 2022)
________________________
| BETWEEN |
|
|
|
THE SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE |
Applicant |
|
and |
|
|
TAM KIT-I |
Respondent |
________________________
(HEARD TOGETHER)
Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Lam PJ and
Mr Justice Tang NPJ
Date of Hearing and Determination: 16 September 2022
____________________
DETERMINATION
____________________
The Appeal Committee:
1. We grant leave to appeal in respect of the following questions which are of the requisite importance, namely:
(a) “What on the true construction of the provisions of the Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance (Cap 455) (“OSCO”) referred to herein, was the consequence of the Judge’s decision in HCMP 1207/2014 (dated 10 August 2016) not to make a confiscation order on the basis of her conclusion that the respondent had not ‘absconded’ within the meaning of section 8(1)(a)(ii)(B)? In particular, did this in law result in the application for a confiscation order being ‘concluded’ within the meaning of section 2(16A)(a) with the consequence that the restraint order dated 30 March 2011 was discharged by operation of section 15(5)(b)?”
(b) “Where a person against whom proceedings under OSCO have been instituted seeks to bring an appeal against a Judge’s refusal to discharge a restraint order, is that appeal criminal or civil in nature for jurisdictional and procedural purposes?
2. We direct that the stay of execution of the Court of Appeal’s judgment be continued pending determination of the appeal.
3. The appeal will be listed for hearing on 28 February 2023.
| (R A V Ribeiro) |
(M H Lam) |
(Robert Tang) |
| Permanent Judge |
Permanent Judge |
Non-Permanent Judge |
Mr William Tam SC, DDPP, Ms Denise Chan, SADPP and Mr Douglas Lau, PP, of the Department of Justice, for the Applicant
Mr Nigel Kat SC and Mr Benson Tsoi, instructed by H M Tsang & Co, for the Respondent
|