HKSAR v. GILLANI SYED RIZWAN AHMED

HCMA 487/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 487 OF 2011

(ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 887 OF 2011)

____________

BETWEEN

____________

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1.  The Appellant was convicted in the Magistrate’s Court on two charges. Charge 1 was of using an identity card relating to another person. Charge 2 was of breach of a condition of stay in that he took up employment in breach of a condition that he shall not take up employment. He now appeals against both convictions.

2.  There was evidence on which to convict on each charge, and I see no error in the way in which the Magistrate went about convicting on the evidence.  Accordingly the appeal is dismissed.