CACV365DM/2019 THE BAR COUNCIL v. MARK RICHARD CHARLTON SUTHERLAND

CACV 365/2019

[2023] HKCA 786

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 365 OF 2019

(ON APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE BARRISTERS

DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL OF THE HONG KONG

SPECIAL ADMINSTRATIVE REGION

MADE ON 18 JULY 2019)

________________

	IN THE MATTER OF the Barristers Disciplinary Tribunal
	and
	IN THE MATTER OF section 37B(1) of the Legal Practitioners Ordinance (Cap. 159 of the Laws of Hong Kong) and Order 59 of the Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4, Sub Leg A of the Laws of Hong Kong)

________________

BETWEEN
	THE BAR COUNCIL	Applicant
	and
	MARK RICHARD CHARLTON SUTHERLAND	Respondent

________________

Before :

Hon Kwan VP and Cheung JA in Court

Date of Decision :

21 June 2023

________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________

Page 2 [2 (1)]:-

“Whether a disciplinary judge who has been instrumental as an informant and/or complaint…”

should read as

“Whether a disciplinary judge who has been instrumental as an informant and/or complainant…”

Dated this 31^st day of July 2023

(Fansilia Lai)
for Registrar, High Court

THE BAR COUNCIL v. MARK RICHARD CHARLTON SUTHERLAND