WONG CHENG v. COUNCIL ON HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY

[2025] HKCFI 5841

Court of First Instance3 December 2025

Judges:Coleman

HCAL146/2012 WONG CHENG v. COUNCIL ON HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY

HCAL 146/2012

[2025] HKCFI 5841

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 146 of 2012

BETWEEN
	Wong Cheng	Applicant
	與 and
	Council on Human Reproductive Technology	Putative Respondent

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3)

Following:

consideration of the documents only; or

consideration of the documents and oral submission by the applicant in court;

Order by The Honourable Mr Justice Coleman :

The Applicant’s application for leave to apply for judicial review is dismissed. I make no order as to costs.

Observations for the Applicant :

Refer to the directions of the Honourable Mr Justice Coleman dated 11 November 2025.

Dated the 3^rd day of December 2025.

	(Alvin Kwok)
	for Registrar, High Court

Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence

Notes for the Applicant: If leave has been granted, the Applicant or his solicitors must:
a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted (Order 53, rule 4A); b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).		Sent/Handed to the Applicant/the Applicant’s solicitors on 3/12/2025 Messrs. Cheung & Liu Solicitors for the Applicant Ref.: NL10/19225/YCF		Sent/Handed to the Respondent/the Respondent’s solicitors / such interested parties as may be directed by the Court / the interested parties’ solicitors on 3/12/2025 COUNCIL ON HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY The Putative Respondent Ref.: HRT/9/4(C) Pt.6

WONG CHENG v. COUNCIL ON HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY

Citation

Court

Procedural posture

Issues

Holdings

Legal principles

Disposition