|
HCMP 1044/2019
[2022] HKCFI 1873
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 1044 OF 2019
____________
| |
IN THE MATTER OF Provisional Agreement for Sale and Purchase dated 14th August 2014 registered in the Land Registry by Memorial No. 14091202240017 (“the Provisional Agreement”).
|
| |
and
|
| |
IN THE MATTER OF ALL THOSE pieces or parcels of ground registered in the Land Registry as LOT NOS. 1017, 1026, 3104, 3105, 963, 1010, 1012, 1020, 1071, 1072, 1079, 1082, 1085, 1087, 1091, 1099, 1411, 2975, 352 Section A, 358, 359, 3007, 3006, 1288 and 1084 ALL IN DEMARCATION DISTRICT NO. 39 and Portions of LOT NO. 1114 IN DEMARCATION DISTRICT NO. 39 (to be known as SECTIONS A, B and C OF LOT NO. 1114 IN DEMARCATION DISTRICT NO. 39) and Portions of LOT NO. 1115 IN DEMARCATION DISTRICT NO. 39 (to be known as SECTIONS A and B OF LOT NO. 1115 IN DEMARCATION DISTRICT NO. 39) and Portion of LOT NO. 1118 IN DEMARCATION DISTRICT NO. 39 (to be known as SECTION A OF LOT NO. 1118 IN DEMARCATION DISTRICT NO. 39).
|
____________
| BETWEEN |
|
|
| |
ANTHONY FRANCIS LI and CLARENCE A LI,
Managers of LI TO WAN TSO |
Plaintiffs |
|
and
|
| |
KWOK WUI KNITTERS LIMITED |
Defendant |
____________
Before: Hon Lok J in Chambers
Date of Statement of Costs: 3 September 2021
Date of List of Objections: 14 September 2021
Date of Summary Assessment of Costs: 20 June 2022
_________________________________
SUMMARY ASSESSMENT OF COSTS
_________________________________
1. This is the summary assessment of costs in respect of the costs order I made on 17 August 2021.
2. The background of this case has been set out in the Decision handed down on 17 August 2021 (“the Decision”) and I do not want to repeat the same here.
3. In the Decision, I dismissed the Plaintiffs’ appeal against the case-management decision made by the Master in ordering these proceedings be continued as if the cause had been so begun by writ.
4. The appeal was argued by counsel on both sides with an estimated time of 3 hours. The Defendant has submitted the Statement of Costs claiming the total costs of $157,678 inclusive of counsel’s fee in the sum of $67,500. In the List of Objections, the Plaintiffs ask for total reduction in the sum of $80,675.
5. The Defendant’s solicitors charged a sum of about $90,000. Given that the appeal was only concerned with a procedural matter and that counsel had been engaged to argue the appeal, I agree that the fees charged by the Defendants’ solicitors are excessive. Having considered the works done by the solicitors, I allow a sum of $50,000. For the counsel’s fees, taking into account the nature of the appeal and the seniority of Mr Phang (called to the bar in 2015), I allow the same sum of $50,000. I therefore summarily assess the Defendants’ costs in the sum of $100,000.
| |
(David Lok) |
| |
Judge of the Court of First Instance |
| |
High Court |
Ng, Lie, Lai & Chan, solicitors for the Plaintiffs
C L Chow & Macksion Chan, solicitors for the Defendant
|