TSAI CHIH HSIANG AND ANOTHER v. GEORGE TUNG, JIMMY NG & VALENT TSE (a firm)

DCCJ 1479/ 2002

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1479 OF 2002

____________________

____________________

AND BETWEEN

(by Counterclaim)

_____________________________________

JUDGMENT

_____________________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

Heading: ‘VICTOR GEORGE TUNG, JIMMY NG & VALENT TSE (a firm)’ should be read as ‘GEORGE TUNG, JIMMY NG & VALENT TSE (a firm)’

Paragraph 61 Line 2 to Line 4: ‘I make an order nisi for costs of the Original Action to be to the Firm with certificate for counsel whereas costs of the Counterclaim to be to Tse with certificate for counsel.’ should be read as ‘I make an order nisi for costs of the Original Action to be to the Firm with certificate for counsel whereas costs of the Counterclaim to be to the 1^st Defendant and the 2^nd Defendant with certificate for counsel.’

Dated the 22^nd day of December 2005