ZETA ESTATES LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE

CACV 191/2005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO.191 OF 2005

(ON APPEAL FROM HCIA NO.2 OF 2005)

-------------------------------------

---------------------

_____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_____________________

1. On page 25 at paragraph 63,  the 1^st sentence should read:

“For the above reasons, the answer I would give to the first question in the case stated is yes.”

2. On page 25 at paragraph 63, the following sentence be added after the last             

          sentence :

“So the answer to the second question, as it applies to paragraph 18 of the case stated, is no.”

 

Dated the 14th day of March, 2006.